With CU2 and the release of 5.5.2 the removal of Oracle Spatial is no
longer needed.

Paul Franz

On Jan 9, 2007, at 12:49 PM, Chris Plough wrote:

> Jada,
>
> None that I'm aware of. We've had to remove Oracle Spatial on
> every OTM v5.5 installation we've done and it's currently a
> recommended step by oracle.
>
> Since Oracle Spatial can utilize NAVTEQ maps, I assume that OTM
> will integrate with it at some point, but I wouldn't expect it
> until v6.0 or later.
>
> --
> Thank you!
>
> Chris Plough
> MavenWire Consultants
> www.mavenwire.com
> chris.plough (AT) mavenwire (DOT) com
> aim: cpMavenWire
> office: 866.343.4870 x701
> fax: 866.343.4870
> --
>
>
> On Jan 9, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Barnett , Jada wrote:
>
>> Hi All
>>
>> We are working on a v5.5 implementation and have worked through
>> the Oracle Spatial issues. De-installing recommendation on
>> Metalink help worked well for us.
>>
>>
>>
>> As we look ahead to apply CU2, we were wondering if anyone else
>> has had any issues with CU2 after working through the Oracle
>> Spatial issues.
>>
>>
>>
>> We would like to be proactive or at a minimum get a "heads up" and
>> avoid any additional delays to our implementation.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Jada Barnett
>>
>> Agility Logisitcs
>> Program Manager, Transport Planning
>> Tel. +1.714.513.3000
>> Mobile +1.858.699.4996
>>
>> jbarnett (AT) agilitylogistics (DOT) com
>