Just an FYI, I investigated the Oracle Spatial issue for a client and the
only problem I found that caused a conflict with OTM 5.5 was the public
synonym called DISTANCE which conflicts with a synonym of the same name used
by OTM. So it may not be necessary to de-install all of spatial only to
remove the conflicting synonym. I imagine that the fix in CU2 was to rename
the synonym in OTM to something else.

-Alan


On 1/9/07 12:55 PM, "Barnett , Jada" <JBarnett (AT) geo-logistics (DOT) com> wrote:

> Thanks Chris and Mauricio - We will continue on!! J
>
>
> Thanks,
> Jada
>
>
> From: owner-otmsig (AT) solutionbeacon (DOT) net [mailtowner-otmsig (AT) solutionbeacon (DOT) net]
> On Behalf Of Mauricio Ramirez
> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 9:56 AM
> To: otmsig (AT) solutionbeacon (DOT) net
> Subject: RE: v5.5 CU2 Issues after de-installing Oracle Spatial
>
> Jada,
>
> We are nearing the end of our v5.5 implementation and we didn't experience any
> issues after applying CU2 in OTM. Of course we've experienced other issues
> throughout our implementation with regard to the Oracle EBS interface but none
> as a result of applying CU2 - or at least none that we've run into yet with
> the functionality that we're using.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mauricio Ramirez
> Lucidity Consulting Group LP
> 214-336-9189 Mobile
> 425-675-8676 Fax
> www.luciditycg.com/video <http://www.luciditycg.com/video>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are the property of Lucidity
> Consulting Group LP, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of
> the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one
> of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have
> received this message in error, please notify the sender at (214) 336-9189 and
> delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention,
> dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly
> prohibited. Unless expressly stated in this e-mail, nothing in this message
> should be construed as a digital or electronic signature.
>
>
>
> From: owner-otmsig (AT) solutionbeacon (DOT) net [mailtowner-otmsig (AT) solutionbeacon (DOT) net]
> On Behalf Of Barnett , Jada
> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 11:27 AM
> To: 'otmsig (AT) solutionbeacon (DOT) net'
> Subject: v5.5 CU2 Issues after de-installing Oracle Spatial
>
> Hi All
> We are working on a v5.5 implementation and have worked through the Oracle
> Spatial issues. De-installing recommendation on Metalink help worked well for
> us.
>
> As we look ahead to apply CU2, we were wondering if anyone else has had any
> issues with CU2 after working through the Oracle Spatial issues.
>
> We would like to be proactive or at a minimum get a "heads up" and avoid any
> additional delays to our implementation.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Jada Barnett
> Agility Logisitcs
> Program Manager, Transport Planning
> Tel. +1.714.513.3000
> Mobile +1.858.699.4996
> jbarnett (AT) agilitylogistics (DOT) com
>
>