View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old December 21st, 2007, 08:28
bob_romijn bob_romijn is offline
Member and Blogger
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Haalderen, Netherlands
Posts: 117
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 7
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 2
bob_romijn is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to bob_romijn
Re: OTM planning scope

Hi,

I don't know exactly what your requirements are, but we did more or less the same for these reasons:

- Total transit times and costs need to be considered and compared to Direct rates. We need to use the best way to ship it.
- Visibility reasons. We wanted to see who carried out the shipment.

Also we have only control up to the pool center. Once it is there, the carrier of the pool center perhaps uses another pool upstream or other carriers. We simply don't care, because they are free to do that.

Reasons that we didn't take into acount, but are very valid in some scenarios:

- Using freight settlement will use a shipment for receiving invoices. You want to have already a shipment to match it to, to make live a bit easier.
- If you want to approve invoices you need to have the rates in place for building a shipment.
- The pool carrier sends milestones back relating to his LTL shipment. You have to relate it to a shipment.

Be aware that you don't need to have complete rates in place for the second legs. It can also be a fictive rate. It all depends on the goals you want to achieve.

There will be several other reasons why you want to have it in place for particular customers.

I hope this helps a bit in your discission.
__________________
Best Regards,

Bob Romijn
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bob_romijn For This Useful Post:
otmrookie (January 3rd, 2008)