View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old March 5th, 2008, 16:21
chrisplough's Avatar
chrisplough chrisplough is offline
Site Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 847
Blog Entries: 7
Thanks: 53
Thanked 205 Times in 124 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 10
chrisplough has a spectacular aura aboutchrisplough has a spectacular aura aboutchrisplough has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via AIM to chrisplough
Re: OTM 5.5 CU4 & EBS 11.5.9 Integration

Ganesh,

In response to your questions:
  1. Application Server Choice: WebSphere Vs Oracle AS (Pros and Cons)
    1. Stay away from WebSphere. I ported the technical architecture of OTM from WebLogic to WebSphere and I can tell you that it (WS) works very poorly with OTM, in terms of configuration, performance and reliability.
    2. WebLogic is the preferred app server for OTM and is highly recommended. Especially when running on Linux, your performance using WebLogic/JRockit can be twice that of OAS/SunJDK.
    3. OAS would be my second choice, but few are using it in production and I don't consider it a good option until OTM 6.0.
    4. You can find more details on OAS vs WebLogic by searching these forums.
  2. Any issues / limitations of implementing flat file integration? (we are thinking of using Python scripts)
    1. No issues - this can be implemented using either Python or any other integration engine. Regardless of the choice, you'll need to convert to G-Log XML in order to post to OTM.
    2. Python is limited in terms of management and performance, but if your volumes are low, this isn't an issue.
I hope this helps!

--Chris
__________________
Chris Plough
MavenWire

www.MavenWire.com
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to chrisplough For This Useful Post:
techgb (March 5th, 2008)