View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old June 7th, 2007, 20:25
chrisplough's Avatar
chrisplough chrisplough is offline
Site Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 847
Blog Entries: 7
Thanks: 53
Thanked 205 Times in 124 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 10
chrisplough has a spectacular aura aboutchrisplough has a spectacular aura aboutchrisplough has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via AIM to chrisplough
Re: V4.5 Update and Migration Question Part 1

Catharine,

You've hit exactly on the main issues that our other clients are experiencing while preparing to migration from older OTM versions (4.0,4.5). There's a multi-pronged approach that we normally take to bring these migration windows down into something more acceptable:
  1. Purge as much data as possible. Many clients don't have a data retention policy and the OTM databases get out of control. This improves all-around performance as well as migration times.
  2. Ensure that your DB is running as efficiently as possible, both from a hardware perspective and an Oracle DB tuning perspective. For instance, our new Linux servers with fast disk arrays run many of these intensive scripts over twice as fast as HP-UX, Solaris and AIX boxes from only a year ago. We've also removed indexes in the past and re-created them post-migration in order to speed up the process.
  3. Tune the migration scripts, just as you've suggested.
So - directly to your point, great work in tracking this down to the pop procedure! I definitely agree that increasing the commit count is a great way to decrease the processing time. While I'm not familiar with this procedure directly, I can't see any reason that altering the procedure, if only for the duration of the migration, wouldn't help significantly. I can't think of anything in the migration process that would be adversely affected by this - as long as you have enough rollback and temp space available.

Are you at the point where you can give this a try and report back your results?

Thanks!
--Chris
__________________
Chris Plough
MavenWire

www.MavenWire.com

Last edited by chrisplough : June 7th, 2007 at 20:33.
Reply With Quote