otmfaqForumsBlogsRegister
FAQMembers ListCalendarToday's PostsSearch


 Subscribe Blogs:RSS
 Subscribe Forums:RSS
 Follow New Posts:Twitter
OTMFAQ Home
OTMFAQ Blogs
OTMFAQ Forums
OTM Wiki

OTM SIG
OTM Wiki
MavenWire


Execution Employing the Tendering process in OTM / G-Log - including the setup of carrier domains, workflow parameters, regional tendering and contact groups.

Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old April 24th, 2009, 10:57
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 24
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
geetikadua is on a distinguished road
Exclamation Secondary Charge Rule- Received

Dear All,


I have faced a very strange case of secondary charge rules.Please find the description of the case as below

Say we have two rules for the same criteria in the system (Serv Provider , Mode, Lane etc) and both are created for Received ( they are just same rules with difference in cost and activation range)

Effective date and expiration date for both are as given below :
rule 1 : 01.01.2009 09.02.2009
rule 2 : 10.02.2009 09.03.2009
Also
Shipment Start date : 07.02.2009
End date : 14.02.2009

Now when secondary shipment is supposed to be created at Received , it says no valid rule found . When i change the expiration date of the first rule to be 15.03.2009 , OTM build the secondary shipment for same. I wonder How??
Also the OTM help says , for Received it always consider the actual delivery . so i think it should take shipment end date in consideration.

There are many doubts in my mind

1. if OTM takes start date or end date into account, in any of the way OTM will get one rule active,So it should build shipment by any rule.
2. If it search for shipment time window in any rule, it wont find any rule. If that's the reason for 'No rule found'
then we could have many such cases, as in our system, rates change is a frequent practice.
3. Also i have seen these cases only of received rules, for Picked Up, it always build on the basis of Shipment start time.If its the case with Picked Up, why not with Received ? Is it some Bug ?

Has some a better picture of OTM functionality for Received rules ?

thanks for cooperation
Regards
Geetika Dua
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old April 24th, 2009, 11:42
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 51
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 11
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 2
vidya is on a distinguished road
Re: Secondary Charge Rule- Received

Hi Geetika,

Pls note the
"Received - create secondary charge when any actuals are recorded for stop with an Activity of R". In that case receiving will consider the delivery date of the shipment..so In your shipment delivery date doesnt fall in any of the rule date... the main purpose of creating secondary shipment is to Invoice a service provider for additional services for the activity...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old April 24th, 2009, 11:59
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 24
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
geetikadua is on a distinguished road
Re: Secondary Charge Rule- Received

Hi Vidya,

Thanks for the reply,

Please correct if my understanding is wrong, as per your reply you mean, my shipment delivery date doesn't fall under any rule, but rule 2 is active till 09.03.2009 and shipment delivery is on 14.02.2009.

can you please suggest ?

Regards
Geetika Dua
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old April 25th, 2009, 13:11
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 51
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 11
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 2
vidya is on a distinguished road
Re: Secondary Charge Rule- Received

Hi Geeta,

Sorry, i am also getting the same error now ...Can anyone clarify on this...

Last edited by vidya; April 25th, 2009 at 13:15. Reason: .
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old April 27th, 2009, 06:58
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 24
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
geetikadua is on a distinguished road
Re: Secondary Charge Rule- Received

Hi


Can anyone please help. !!!! Is it a OTM bug ??
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
rail rule 11 rj5316 Planning 2 July 29th, 2009 15:01
Condition on the Criteria Service Provider in defining the Secondary Charge Rules Lakshmi Order Processing 1 December 11th, 2008 06:52
Trying to create a BNG Rule for Secondary Charge dschmidt Workflow and Agents 0 September 17th, 2008 16:31
Rate offerings for secondary charges have to be active in 5.5 blasley Rating 0 April 30th, 2008 18:37
Has Anyone Ever Used Secondary Charges ebauchwitz Rating 0 January 30th, 2007 13:18



All times are GMT. The time now is 18:08.
Copyright © 2006-2009, Open Book Solutions LLC. All rights reserved.


Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40