otmfaqForumsBlogsRegister
FAQMembers ListCalendarToday's PostsSearch


 Subscribe Blogs:RSS
 Subscribe Forums:RSS
 Follow New Posts:Twitter
OTMFAQ Home
OTMFAQ Blogs
OTMFAQ Forums
OTM Wiki

OTM SIG
OTM Wiki
MavenWire

Go Back   Oracle OTM / G-Log GC3 Community Support > OTM / G-Log - Functional Topics > Planning
Reload this Page

Suggestion for getting commitments on full loads.


Planning Planning orders in OTM / G-Log - including bulk planning, itineraries, planning parameters, load configuration and optimization.

Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old August 21st, 2009, 13:05
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
thopper is on a distinguished road
Question Suggestion for getting commitments on full loads.

Currently we are running bulk plans for regions. Let's say for example we are planning for a region and we have 3000 cubes of freight that we need to plan for that region. For the type of freight we only 2800 cubes will fit on a shipment. So when we run the bulk plan we have it creating shipment #1 approx 2800 cubes and shipment #2 with approx 200 cubes. Then we choose to execute on shipment #1 and use the freight on shipment #2 at a later time when there is more volume.

Ok we have this working pretty well...here is our problem. Commitments. Usually we have at least one commitment (has to be there Tues @ 8am) per 3000 cubes. Well on the above example sometimes it will put the commitment on the 200 cube shipment. Which sense it is a commitment we don't want to wait to ship it later. We totally understand why it does this. But are there any suggestions as to how to try to get the commitment on the full truck.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old August 24th, 2009, 12:35
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Chennai
Posts: 53
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 6
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 2
uppiliyappan is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Yahoo to uppiliyappan Send a message via Skype™ to uppiliyappan
Re: Suggestion for getting commitments on full loads.

Hi Thopper

Write an agent with a saved condition for checking the Total gross weight of the shipment equal to the s_equipment. If it is greater than or equal then do the action update actual commitment and allocation.

Revert back if any help needed.

Rgds
Uppili
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old August 24th, 2009, 12:36
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Chennai
Posts: 53
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 6
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 2
uppiliyappan is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Yahoo to uppiliyappan Send a message via Skype™ to uppiliyappan
Re: Suggestion for getting commitments on full loads.

Ensure to deactivate the public agent Update Capacity Allocation, else two agents will act at the same time...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old August 24th, 2009, 14:12
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
thopper is on a distinguished road
Re: Suggestion for getting commitments on full loads.

Thanks for the reply Uppili

But I'm trying to understand exactly what you are suggesting.

I'm going to create an agent that looks at total volume of shipment vs total volume of s_equipment. Which on s_equipment all I see is load_config_volume which I don't see that it is set when I look at the shipments we have out there now.

Then this agent will do the action of update actual commitment and allocation.

What I don't really understand is how will this cause commitments to be on full trucks. Because all I think I see it doing is making sure commitments are hit on the shipments it builds.

However it's totally possible I don't understand.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old August 24th, 2009, 15:46
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Chennai
Posts: 53
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 6
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 2
uppiliyappan is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Yahoo to uppiliyappan Send a message via Skype™ to uppiliyappan
Re: Suggestion for getting commitments on full loads.

Sorry thopper.. I think i got you wrongly... Here your requirement is to send 200 cubes along with 2800 cubes at times when you dont want to wait for some more volumes to aggregate... OR
You need to increase your commitment count to service providers only if you send a full truck of load(2800)..

My earliest reply is the solution for the later requirement i mentioned.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tuning data loads mnlv00 Data Loading 0 May 12th, 2008 14:13
Continuous Move , Dedicated Loads. skunniyur Planning 6 February 27th, 2008 09:59
dmidecode - full system info for Linux chrisplough SysAdmin and Management 0 January 24th, 2008 03:47
Multi Stop Loads cwarner Planning 0 October 31st, 2007 17:48



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:00.
Copyright © 2006-2009, Open Book Solutions LLC. All rights reserved.


Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40