otmfaqForumsBlogsRegister
FAQMembers ListCalendarToday's PostsSearch


 Subscribe Blogs:RSS
 Subscribe Forums:RSS
OTMFAQ Home
OTMFAQ Blogs
OTMFAQ Forums
OTMFAQ Tutorials

OTM SIG
MavenWire


Planning Planning orders in OTM / G-Log - including bulk planning, itineraries, planning parameters, load configuration and optimization.

Tags: ,

Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old August 14th, 2007, 12:59
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Havertown, PA
Posts: 37
Thanks: 4
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
joecallan is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to joecallan Send a message via Yahoo to joecallan
Using Via Locations vs Interim Locations

I am looking to configure rates and itineraries based on agents that provide the following service:

Origin Location to Destination Airport via Origin Airport

From what I can see, adding via locations to the itinerary excludes rates lacking similar via points from evaluation. It offers no additional track and trace capabilities.

Can the above scenario be combined into 1 leg on an itinerary? How can I factor in the air schedules which are Origin Airport to Destination Airport?

Thanks,
Joe
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old August 15th, 2007, 13:22
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Havertown, PA
Posts: 37
Thanks: 4
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
joecallan is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to joecallan Send a message via Yahoo to joecallan
Re: Using Via Locations vs Interim Locations

We have ruled out using Via Points and now know that interim points are the way that we would like to proceed (Interim Points appear as a stop on the shipment Stops tab). We have been successful building a TL shipment with an interim point, so I am now trying to plan a single legged AIR shipment using an interim point.

This is what I have found:

1. An air order will create a shipment without an interim point on the itinerary.

2. An air order will not create a shipment with an interim point on the itinerary.

3. I tried adding an interim flight to the air schedule to simulate the hub to origin airport portion of the move - still unsuccessful.

4. I removed the interim point from the itinerary and the order planned using the schedule in #3.

5. I changed the itinerary leg to TL and the order plans with the interim stop included.

Has anyone out there been successful using interim points with a mode profile of air?

Thanks,
Joe

Last edited by joecallan : August 15th, 2007 at 13:26. Reason: misspelling
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old August 17th, 2007, 00:22
Senior Member and Blogger
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Singapore
Posts: 147
Blog Entries: 5
Thanks: 5
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 2
ianlo is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to ianlo Send a message via Skype™ to ianlo
Re: Using Via Locations vs Interim Locations

Quote:
Originally Posted by joecallan View Post
We have ruled out using Via Points and now know that interim points are the way that we would like to proceed (Interim Points appear as a stop on the shipment Stops tab). We have been successful building a TL shipment with an interim point, so I am now trying to plan a single legged AIR shipment using an interim point.

This is what I have found:

1. An air order will create a shipment without an interim point on the itinerary.

2. An air order will not create a shipment with an interim point on the itinerary.

3. I tried adding an interim flight to the air schedule to simulate the hub to origin airport portion of the move - still unsuccessful.

4. I removed the interim point from the itinerary and the order planned using the schedule in #3.

5. I changed the itinerary leg to TL and the order plans with the interim stop included.

Has anyone out there been successful using interim points with a mode profile of air?

Thanks,
Joe
Hi Joe,

What version of OTM are you using? Are you planning on Order Releases or Order Movements?

In our implementation, we are using interim stops for ground transport movements and not for air. We have modelled our movements much like yours - source > customs location > destination. Honestly, I kinda regret using interim stops as I am planning onto them using Order Movements and they have given me nothing but headaches.

Apparently, interim stop functionality is not very well implemented (unlike normal point to point movements)

If possible, I would suggest you model your movements (if business allows) for point to point itineraries.

The problems with interim stops I have are as follows:
1) Unable to add order movements / order releases on to shipments planned with interim stops
2) Unable to properly consolidate orders into planned shipments in the expected manner when using interim stop itineraries (this has been addressed in the following thread - http://www.otmfaq.com/forums/f15/5-5...-shipment-420/
3) Bulk planning produces the wrong stop locations (although timings are correct) (this is addressed in OTM 5.5 CU3RU1
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old August 17th, 2007, 09:43
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Havertown, PA
Posts: 37
Thanks: 4
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
joecallan is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to joecallan Send a message via Yahoo to joecallan
Re: Using Via Locations vs Interim Locations

Ian:

We are on OTM 5.5 CU3 and are using Order Releases.

Thanks for the feedback.

Here is an update:

- I haven't been able to have the origin airport included as an interim point on a shipment in conjunction with service time calculations.

- The alternative was to add the Airports to the Hubs as Operational Locations and check the "Assign Operational Locations to Stops" box on the appropriate leg of the itinerary. The positives are that the shipments now factor in service time and the rates & schedules should be sufficient as is. The negative is that the customer will not be able to collect event info at the interim airport. They will however, know the freight is between the origin Hub and the destination Airport and will be able to approximate its arrival.

After reading your points below, I'm hoping operational location functionality is more flexible than the interim point.

Joe
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old September 4th, 2007, 09:13
Senior Member and Blogger
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Singapore
Posts: 147
Blog Entries: 5
Thanks: 5
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 2
ianlo is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to ianlo Send a message via Skype™ to ianlo
Re: Using Via Locations vs Interim Locations

Hi Joe,

Yep what you mention sounds about right. We also experimented with VIA locations initially, but realised that we had to use interim stops because business and ops insisted that they wanted to collect events on interim stops.

On hindsight, if I would have known, I would have tried to dissuade them from using interim stops - but I guess its too late now.. we are too deep into the project and too close to the go-live to even consider otherwise.

I hope you have better luck with VIA locations. All the best!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Locations thru Integration? itnole Integration and Data Mapping 3 March 10th, 2008 23:49
Air shipment - between two non-airport locations Pankajkum Planning 1 February 29th, 2008 04:37
Integrating OTM with RTLS (GPS locations) rj5316 Integration and Data Mapping 5 January 24th, 2008 20:31
Operational Locations in Shipment Planning samuellevin_mavenwire Planning 1 August 17th, 2007 15:15



All times are GMT. The time now is 13:23.
Copyright © 2008, Open Book Solutions LLC. All rights reserved.

Sponsored by MavenWire - MavenWire.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37