otmfaqForumsBlogsRegister
FAQMembers ListCalendarToday's PostsSearch


 Subscribe Blogs:RSS
 Subscribe Forums:RSS
 Follow New Posts:Twitter
OTMFAQ Home
OTMFAQ Blogs
OTMFAQ Forums
OTM Wiki

OTM SIG
OTM Wiki
MavenWire

Go Back   Oracle OTM / G-Log GC3 Community Support > OTM / G-Log - Functional Topics > Rating
Reload this Page

Secure Resources by Planner but No Tender


Rating Configuring and troubleshooting Rating and RIQ in OTM / G-Log.

Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old February 11th, 2008, 17:57
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 75
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 8
Thanked 13 Times in 11 Posts
Rep Power: 3
cwarner is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to cwarner
Secure Resources by Planner but No Tender

How can I configure a service provider to be available to receive a secure resources by planner, but not be available by secure resources? I want the trucker to get the tender confirmation but not the tender. We have a rate record setup for a trucker for usa to usa but he is not available for all of those shipments. Instead we are only going to secure resources by planner for that provider, but if we do a secure resources on a load, we don't want that provider to be included in the list of providers to tender through.

I tried turning of the Allow Tender checkbox, but that didn't allow me to do what I want. Does anyone know how I could do this, or at least which way I should be looking to figure it out?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old February 11th, 2008, 21:03
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Leuven - Belgium
Posts: 21
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Rep Power: 0
rvhaaster is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to rvhaaster
Re: Secure Resources by Planner but No Tender

Is it the case that for some lanes you do want to plan shipments with this servprov and for others you don't? In that case you need to make your geo-hierarchies on the rate record more specific than usa-usa.

Or is it the case that the servprov that is not allowed in the tender process is only used in exceptional cases? Is a manual workaround acceptable in that case? If so, you can have a look at the active flag at the Rate Offering. Then this carrier won't be used during normal planning but you can force a shipment to this carrier by including a constraint or use some of the shipment - change servprov actions (haven't tested that).

Third option would be to look at using rate quality and penalize this specific carrier.
__________________
Rob van Haaster

MavenWire Europe
www.MavenWire.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rvhaaster For This Useful Post:
cwarner (February 12th, 2008)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old February 11th, 2008, 21:06
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 75
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 8
Thanked 13 Times in 11 Posts
Rep Power: 3
cwarner is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to cwarner
Re: Secure Resources by Planner but No Tender

It is only one carrier, and we are looking to never have him considered at all in the tender process, but always available for secure resources by planner. Wouldn't we have to activate the carrier to sec res by planner?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old February 12th, 2008, 16:19
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
rsadani is on a distinguished road
Re: Secure Resources by Planner but No Tender

In that case, The later solution suggested by rvhaaster should work.

One more option could be to
1. Define a Service provider profile for this carrier
2. Uncheck the Compatible flag on the Service provider profile.
3. Assign this service provider profile in Constraints tab on order release (you can use some form of automation for this)
The service provider will then be excluded for Planning process.

Thanks
Ravindra
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old February 12th, 2008, 17:13
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 75
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 8
Thanked 13 Times in 11 Posts
Rep Power: 3
cwarner is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to cwarner
Re: Secure Resources by Planner but No Tender

I think that the way that we are going to look to go is to change the rate quality for the provider. We already have a fake carrier in that allows us to build all shipments (so we don't get an error that no rate record is setup for a lane), and we have an agent set that withdraws the tender when it gets to that fake trucker. So our plan is to put the new carrier in as lower than the fake one, never allowing the tender process to get that far. Thanks for your suggestions.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Secure resources timed out waiting for lock on object shipment mosubram Planning 3 February 27th, 2009 00:18
Shipment resources withdrawn email only!! yogi43 Execution 0 March 21st, 2008 14:18
Unable to secure resources for shipments surender Workflow and Agents 0 January 18th, 2008 11:14
[SOLVED] Geocoding resources chrisplough Planning 7 April 26th, 2007 19:38
Spot Tender/Broadcast Tender Process Within OTM Dilday Stephen Email List Archive 0 February 8th, 2007 19:11



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:28.
Copyright © 2006-2009, Open Book Solutions LLC. All rights reserved.


Inactive Reminders By Icora Web Design

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40