| | Database Administration Database installation, creation, administration and related topics. |  | 
August 8th, 2008, 16:13
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 146
Groans: 0
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 16
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Rep Power: 3 | | | OTM table sizing How does one do a table sizing in OTM
what are impending factors ...
Rgds--- | 
August 9th, 2008, 01:48
| | Senior Member and Blogger | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Drexel Hill, PA
Posts: 378
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 67 Times in 63 Posts
Rep Power: 3 | | | Re: OTM table sizing It varies by shipments, orders, invoices etc. and how long you want to keep your transmissions. There isn't a set way to measure this as each client uses the application differently. The larger and longer they are, the larger DB size you will need. For midsize to large corporations estimate between 150-300GB for the database, not including the amount for backups. | 
August 13th, 2008, 20:25
|  | Site Moderator | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 1,167
Groans: 0
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 143
Thanked 259 Times in 161 Posts
Rep Power: 10 | | | Re: OTM table sizing Also, the best way to reduce OTM DB growth is to setup and utilize the purge packages/procedures mentioned in the OTM Administration guide. This often requires customization of the processes to get them to fully work (we've done this for a lot of clients), but should improve significantly in OTM v6.0.
This process will purge out the integration XML that is saved for incoming and outbound transmissions, which can account for 70-80% of your database growth.
--Chris | 
November 30th, 2009, 16:24
| | Member | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Italy
Posts: 39
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 5
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Rep Power: 0 | | | Re: OTM table sizing Chris
After purging procedure on I_TRANSMISSION & I_TRANSACTION, seems however necessary to run a REORG on these table (due to CLOB/BLOB) objects to really reclaim space, do you know a different way?
This happens in your experience only working with partitioned table ?
Thanks in advance
__________________ --------------------------------------- Stefano Giommi Business REPLY E-Mail: s.giommi@reply.it Office : +39 02 53576.1 http://www.reply.eu --------------------------------------- | 
November 30th, 2009, 16:32
| | Senior Member and Blogger | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Drexel Hill, PA
Posts: 378
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 67 Times in 63 Posts
Rep Power: 3 | | | Re: OTM table sizing That's probably the easiest way to show the reclaimed space. There are other ways of doing this such as creating a new tablespace and copying the data over to it, but this is a bug in the Oracle database code. | | The Following User Says Thank You to nick.polites For This Useful Post: | | 
December 1st, 2009, 04:13
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 14
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Rep Power: 0 | | | Re: OTM table sizing Why reorg when you'll be reusing the space for the next round of inserts of xml clobs?
Last edited by stoganv; December 1st, 2009 at 04:25.
| 
December 1st, 2009, 12:31
| | Senior Member and Blogger | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Drexel Hill, PA
Posts: 378
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 67 Times in 63 Posts
Rep Power: 3 | | | Re: OTM table sizing You don't need to but is speeds up the exports if you do. |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| | | | |