| | Integration and Data Mapping Integrating OTM / G-Log with external and legacy systems - including XML, WebServices, SOA, ESB, BPEL, EDI and Oracle's Fusion. |  | | 
July 2nd, 2007, 23:06
|  | Site Moderator | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 821
Thanks: 53
Thanked 201 Times in 121 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 10 | | Opinions on Integration Engines? Hello!
I'm aware of the following integration products and technologies that have been used with OTM. I'd love to get real-world feedback and opinions on what works and doesn't, to better complete this list. To my knowledge this is the available list:
Proven, though expensive: Capable, but complex: - IBM WebSphere Integration Server
Reliable and less expensive: - HP Mercator
- Sun SeeBeyond eGate
Inexpensive, though reported to have volume issues: Newer (capable) technologies, though unproven: - Oracle BPEL / Oracle ESB
- Active Endpoints BPEL
Cheap, but limited capabilities: - OTM Python Scripts (included w/ OTM)
Others
Let me know your thoughts on these and we can go into more depth.
Thanks!
--Chris | 
July 10th, 2007, 17:13
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 27
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0 | | | Re: Opinions on Integration Engines? Chris,
Used WebMethods to integrate to OTM. We had issues with http post with error acknowledgements not coming back and not hiting the integration layer. WebMethods is going towards service oriented architecture can interact with OTM with JMS API - if OTM uses OAQ protocol.
I can provide you details regarding
JCAPS SOA/BPEL
Oracle SOA/BPEL
After certain time.
RK. | 
July 10th, 2007, 17:24
|  | Site Moderator | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 821
Thanks: 53
Thanked 201 Times in 121 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 10 | | | Re: Opinions on Integration Engines? Thanks! I'd definitely appreciate the feedback. Any information that you can provide the forum regarding JCAPS SOA/BPEL and Oracle SOA/BPEL would benefit the community and would be greatly appreciated.
--Chris | 
July 11th, 2007, 13:02
| | Member | | Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 36
Thanks: 1
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0 | | | Re: Opinions on Integration Engines? Hi Chris,
We are integrating EBS with OTM v.5.5 CU2 utilizing Fusion 10.1.2 (moving to 10.1.3 this week). So far we have had to modify all of the pre-built integrations delievered with the EBS OTM patches to meet our requirements. Additionally, these patches create heavy restrictions to existing EBS functionality (specifically Trip modifications) - so we are having to adjust the BPEL integrations accordingly to accomodate.
We use 3rd party WMS packages which allow certain transportation related "functionality" - these transactional changes need to be dealt with back upstream in OTM since EBS will not allow. We are looking to leaverage Fusion to handle some of these cases.
Related: Is there a forum that deals specifically with EBS integration? Any plans to add one?
Thanks,
Jeff | | The Following User Says Thank You to jeff.depaul For This Useful Post: | | 
July 11th, 2007, 13:49
|  | Site Moderator | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 821
Thanks: 53
Thanked 201 Times in 121 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 10 | | | Re: Opinions on Integration Engines? Jeff,
Thanks for the feedback. I can definitely agree with you -- we've had to do exactly the same with the 3 clients where we had to integrate EBS and OTM.
In addition to the customizations to meet required business functionality, some of the data touch points are cumbersome -- for instance to change the delivery time on a shipment, you have to go all the way back to EBS, make the change and then reprocess the delivery to update the Order Release in OTM. This can be a difficult business process for the client, especially those that are used to the functionality and user interface of OTM. (Note: Having worked on OTM for so long, I'm definitely biased - I like the OTM interface MUCH better than the EBS forms interface, which I found confusing. I'm looking forward to playing with EBS R12 next month, though, to see how improved it is.)
We've had to make customizations to allow data changes in OTM, which get propagated back to EBS and allow the logistics planners to remain in the OTM screens for simple operations.
I haven't had to deal with 3rd party WMS modules at any of our clients yet. Please let us know how that goes -- I'm interested if it will work with the current integration and if you'll be able to use Fusion to handle some of that functionality.
Thanks for the suggestion on the additional forum. I expect the EBS / OTM integration to become a large area of interest, now that G-Log is part of Oracle. I want to see a strong interest from the community (read: enough posts) before adding another forum. For now, it's still the minority, with the bulk of OTM customers integrating with other systems (SAP, home-grown, etc). Please feel free to post here until it reaches critical mass
Thanks!
--Chris | 
July 12th, 2007, 18:31
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0 | | | Re: Opinions on Integration Engines? We too are using BPEL to integrate between EBS and OTM and have found the default packages sorely lacking. We will be modifying the existing BPEL order interfaces - the trip create seems to be working for us at the moment -, and will be creating several additional integrations with our transport mechanism TBD.
There is marked inconsistency between the Shipping and Purchasing order interfaces: items and the usage of references for example. It is as if two separate groups not communicating with each other designed them.
I "heard" through our onsite consultant that Oracle is in the process of "scoping" out a second BPEL release to clean up some of their freshman efforts. Would love to get involved in that.
Regards,
Pete | 
July 13th, 2007, 16:16
|  | Site Moderator | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 821
Thanks: 53
Thanked 201 Times in 121 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 10 | | | Re: Opinions on Integration Engines? Pete,
I'm not aware of any client whose been able to use the flows out of the box -- though that's not my greatest concern. Issue resolution has been longer with Oracle than I was used to with G-Log (we weren't great - but we were often able to get quick-fixes out the door effectively).
I've also heard that the integration is being revamped, but haven't been able to get a release date, even from developers. I would guess that it'll be released with OTM 6.0, though (hopefully) something will be out sooner. I would also hope that the integration comes in at the Order Base level, instead of Order Release.
Should you hear anything - dates, specs, included updates - please post back and help keep the community in the loop  Also - please share your experiences with the integration as you move forward - required customizations, requests for improvement, etc. In addition to running the forums, I'm on the OTM SIG Board and will do my best to bring these issues/suggestions to light with Oracle.
Thanks!
--Chris | 
September 27th, 2007, 05:50
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0 | | | Re: Opinions on Integration Engines? Hi Chris,
This is Sandip here. I am new to this area of OTM. My main area of interest is OTM-EBS integration. Do we have any opinions on whether it is possible to use a third party integration product to integrate OTM and EBS rather than using the Oracle BPEL processes. Or is integration via BPEL the only way out?
Rgds,
Sandip | 
October 1st, 2007, 14:43
|  | Site Moderator | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 821
Thanks: 53
Thanked 201 Times in 121 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 10 | | | Re: Opinions on Integration Engines? Sandip,
If you're looking to utilize the prepackaged integration flows that Oracle provides, then you'll have to utilize their BPEL server and integration infrastructure. However, if you're looking to utilize custom integration (as the bulk of OTM clients are), then any integration server will work and the choice should be based off of cost, reliability, technical stack, employee expertise, etc.
While most OTM clients are using 3rd party OMS/WMS applications (SAP, home-brew, etc), the same logic applies to integrating EBS and OTM. They are separate products and can be integrated using the integration engine of your choice.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Chris | | The Following User Says Thank You to chrisplough For This Useful Post: | | 
October 13th, 2007, 04:29
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0 | | | Re: Opinions on Integration Engines? Chris, This is Rpan from Coke, in our environment we are using IBM MQ and Tibco for your integration with different Order Management systems, and please let me know what kind of information you are expecting from us. |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |