otmfaqForumsBlogsRegister
FAQMembers ListCalendarToday's PostsSearch


 Subscribe Blogs:RSS
 Subscribe Forums:RSS
OTMFAQ Home
OTMFAQ Blogs
OTMFAQ Forums
OTMFAQ Tutorials

OTM SIG
MavenWire


Performance, Scalability and HA Optimizing the performance of OTM / G-Log, configuring Scalability (SCA) and maintaining High Availability.

Tags: , ,

Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old July 31st, 2008, 14:01
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
salims is on a distinguished road
OTM v5.0 planning performance on Linux

We are load testing OTMv5.0 on Red Hat linux 4.0AS envionrment with JRocket JVM 1.4.2. Application server is running HP BL680c with 16 cores.

We are seeing good performance results but finding planning thread group not scalaing under load. It seems to be not using the cores fully at all.

Our observations are

The AgentUtility thread group is processing transactions 4-5 times faster under load, however, the AgentPlanning is 4-5 times slower, taking an average of 10 seconds to process transactions when set to 40 threads, and about 5 seconds per transaction with 20 threads. Further to that, I reduced the threads to 10, and again saw the time half.

Again I reduced the threads to 5, and saw the time reduced to 0.24 seconds per transaction.

It appears that the AgentPlanning Thread Group is only able to utilise one core on the Application server(bl680c02). All other thread Groups are scaling.

Following are the JVM parameters from weblogic.conf
wrapper.java.additional.1=-jrockit
wrapper.java.additional.2=-Xms2304m
wrapper.java.additional.3=-Xmx2304m
wrapper.java.additional.4=-Xgcprio:throughput
wrapper.java.additional.5=-Xverbose:memory
wrapper.java.additional.6=-Xnoclassgc

Are there any other tunning required on Linux for it to scale better?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old August 13th, 2008, 22:00
chrisplough's Avatar
Site Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 847
Blog Entries: 7
Thanks: 53
Thanked 205 Times in 124 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 10
chrisplough has a spectacular aura aboutchrisplough has a spectacular aura aboutchrisplough has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via AIM to chrisplough
Re: OTM v5.0 planning performance on Linux

Salim,

Could you post a follow-up, based on the latest round of performance testing? I know that we found a single-threaded issue related to the way BNG was being utilized, but believe the community would benefit from your experience testing and comparing the performance of Linux versus Solaris.

Thanks,
Chris
__________________
Chris Plough
MavenWire

www.MavenWire.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Planning Parameters and Multi-Stop Planning Rates joecallan Planning 3 May 23rd, 2008 07:36
Planning parameters and properties in v5.5 to improve Bulk Planning sknmail@rediffmail.com Performance, Scalability and HA 5 April 25th, 2008 15:30
Out of Memory - LINUX BigB SysAdmin and Management 2 April 23rd, 2008 14:07
Warnings During OTM 5.5 Installation On Linux ianlo Installation and Upgrades 2 January 8th, 2008 09:48
OTM 64 bit on a Linux 64 Bit OS mnlv00 Installation and Upgrades 9 December 6th, 2007 20:01



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:33.
Copyright © 2008, Open Book Solutions LLC. All rights reserved.

Sponsored by MavenWire - MavenWire.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37