Hi All

We are working on a v5.5 implementation and have worked through the Oracle
Spatial issues. De-installing recommendation on Metalink help worked well
for us.



As we look ahead to apply CU2, we were wondering if anyone else has had any
issues with CU2 after working through the Oracle Spatial issues.



We would like to be proactive or at a minimum get a "heads up" and avoid any
additional delays to our implementation.



Regards,





Jada Barnett

Agility Logisitcs
Program Manager, Transport Planning
Tel. +1.714.513.3000
Mobile +1.858.699.4996

jbarnett (AT) agilitylogistics (DOT) com <mailto:jbarnett (AT) agilitylogistics (DOT) com>

Jada,

None that I'm aware of. We've had to remove Oracle Spatial on every
OTM v5.5 installation we've done and it's currently a recommended
step by oracle.

Since Oracle Spatial can utilize NAVTEQ maps, I assume that OTM will
integrate with it at some point, but I wouldn't expect it until v6.0
or later.

--
Thank you!

Chris Plough
MavenWire Consultants
www.mavenwire.com
chris.plough (AT) mavenwire (DOT) com
aim: cpMavenWire
office: 866.343.4870 x701
fax: 866.343.4870
--


On Jan 9, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Barnett , Jada wrote:

> Hi All
>
> We are working on a v5.5 implementation and have worked through the
> Oracle Spatial issues. De-installing recommendation on Metalink
> help worked well for us.
>
>
>
> As we look ahead to apply CU2, we were wondering if anyone else has
> had any issues with CU2 after working through the Oracle Spatial
> issues.
>
>
>
> We would like to be proactive or at a minimum get a "heads up" and
> avoid any additional delays to our implementation.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Jada Barnett
>
> Agility Logisitcs
> Program Manager, Transport Planning
> Tel. +1.714.513.3000
> Mobile +1.858.699.4996
>
> jbarnett (AT) agilitylogistics (DOT) com

With CU2 and the release of 5.5.2 the removal of Oracle Spatial is no
longer needed.

Paul Franz

On Jan 9, 2007, at 12:49 PM, Chris Plough wrote:

> Jada,
>
> None that I'm aware of. We've had to remove Oracle Spatial on
> every OTM v5.5 installation we've done and it's currently a
> recommended step by oracle.
>
> Since Oracle Spatial can utilize NAVTEQ maps, I assume that OTM
> will integrate with it at some point, but I wouldn't expect it
> until v6.0 or later.
>
> --
> Thank you!
>
> Chris Plough
> MavenWire Consultants
> www.mavenwire.com
> chris.plough (AT) mavenwire (DOT) com
> aim: cpMavenWire
> office: 866.343.4870 x701
> fax: 866.343.4870
> --
>
>
> On Jan 9, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Barnett , Jada wrote:
>
>> Hi All
>>
>> We are working on a v5.5 implementation and have worked through
>> the Oracle Spatial issues. De-installing recommendation on
>> Metalink help worked well for us.
>>
>>
>>
>> As we look ahead to apply CU2, we were wondering if anyone else
>> has had any issues with CU2 after working through the Oracle
>> Spatial issues.
>>
>>
>>
>> We would like to be proactive or at a minimum get a "heads up" and
>> avoid any additional delays to our implementation.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Jada Barnett
>>
>> Agility Logisitcs
>> Program Manager, Transport Planning
>> Tel. +1.714.513.3000
>> Mobile +1.858.699.4996
>>
>> jbarnett (AT) agilitylogistics (DOT) com
>